Going for the Perfectly Routed Proposal: The Grants Office's Top 10
These resources hold the presentation materials from the training session held in April 2013. The session highlighted the most common problems (and solutions!) that the Medical School Grants Office comes across during administrative review, things to keep in mind when putting a proposal together, and some best practices. Attendees left with a better understanding of what happens during the Grants Office review and how to prevent common issues. The session was geared towards all experience levels, from the newest hire to the seasoned research administrator.

• The Perfectly Routed Proposal - The PDF of the PowerPoint presentation from the session.
• Frequently Required Proposal Information - A link to the standard information that is needed for Face/Cover Pages when preparing proposals, provided by ORSP.
• FCOI Disclosures for Proposals - The campus FAQ site provides detailed information about the Financial Conflict of Interest (FCOI) regulations.
• Checklist for Routing the Administrative Shell - This page presents the items that are reviewed by the Medical School when an Administrative Shell is routed for review and approval.
• Comments in eRPM - This best practice describes how comments that are left in eRPM need to be concise but thorough for all potential viewers.
• Counting Pages - This best practice details a quick and easy method for ensuring you are not over the allowed page limit.
• Administrative Shell Changes After Routing - This document describes the procedure that should be followed when changes are made in eRPM after a proposal has been routed.
• Proposal Finalization Checklist - This checklist provides you with key items to check before finalizing a proposal (reflective of issues commonly found prior to submission).
• Ready to Finalize? - This best practice explains the process of creating and reviewing the 'final' PDF prior to finalizing or submitting a NIH proposal.
• Service Policy on Submitting PHS Proposals - Our service policy on submitting PHS system-to-system electronic proposals.
• Review of Proposals in Commons - This document clarifies the NIH 2-day window following proposal submission and ability to reject / resubmit a proposal.

The Administrative Shell of the NIH Research Grant
This page contains the presentation materials from the training session held in May 2013. This session walked through the common information and expectations of putting together the administrative shell pages for an NIH research grant application (R01, or similar) -- covering issues from the first question of Application Type on the cover page to the Multiple PI Plan on the last, and almost everything in between. A significant portion of the time was spent on budget/justification rules and institutional expectations, as well as highlighting the last things you should double check before saying "Submit!"

• The Administrative Shell of a NIH Research Grant - The PDF of the PowerPoint Presentation from the session.
• Sample SF424 Application - A PDF of the SF424 application (administrative shell components).
• Biosketch - Guidance on how to prepare a biosketch.
• Sample Biosketch - A link to the Sample Biosketch provided by the NIH in Word format.
• Differences Between the Biosketch and Other Support - A link to the Grant Services & Analysis webpage that describes the differences between the two documents.
• Budget Justification - Guidance, by budget type, on preparing the budget justification.
• Consortium/Contractual Arrangements - Guidance on what to obtain when including subcontract sites in an application.
• Letter of Commitment to Establish a Subcontract Agreement - A link to the form that should be filled out by the subcontract sites when preparing an application.  This form includes the required FCOI questions.
• Facilities & Other Resources - Guidance on what to include in the Facilities & Other Resources document.
• Multiple PI Leadership Plan - Guidance on what to include in the Multiple PI Leadership Plan
• NIH SF424 Application Instructions - A link to the SF424 Application Instructions provided by the NIH.

Budgeting a Clinical Trial - A PDF of slides from a 2012 training session on how to budget a clinical trial.

A Basic Definition of Cost Sharing - A quick description of the institutional investment created when full costs are not requested or recovered by the sponsor.

The Difference Between Tracked (Quantified) and Not (Non-Quantified) Cost Sharing - Not all institutional investment (cost sharing) must be tracked. This video explains the difference in terms of what is represented to the sponsor.

Effort - Navigate Lunch and Learn - ORSP's Navigate: Lunch & Learn session from February 2018 covering effort reporting and certification. Faculty and staff are responsible for monitoring their activities to ensure that their effort is supported by fund sources appropriate to their activities, and for certifying their effort on an annual basis. But effort reporting and certification can be a confusing topic for faculty and research administrators alike. In this Lunch & Learn session, Heather Offhaus, Director of the Medical School Grants Review & Analysis Office, provided a basic overview of Effort and discussed its importance.

Effort Part 1 - The Three Mantras of Effort Reporting - An introduction to the basics of understanding effort & effort reporting. Three simple rules to why and when you track what.

Effort Part 2 - Talking with Faculty About Effort - Tips on discussing effort with those that must report and certify their effort.

The Intergovernmental Personnel Act (IPA) Mobility Program allows temporary work assignment of employees between UM and federal agencies by executing an IPA Assignment Agreement. The employee on assignment remains an employee of and continues to be paid by their respective employer for the duration of the time they are on the temporary work assignment. Reimbursement for employee expenses are negotiated between the two parties but at a minimum typically include salary and fringe benefits. For more guidance, visit Intergovernmental Personnel Act (IPA) Assignment Agreement Guidance.

The process of transferring grants between institutions can be difficult. Not only does the PI have preferences to express, but the institutions involved have to agree. And once the decision to transfer (or not!) is made, each individual grant may have different requirements, even when dealing with the same sponsor. It is important to communicate among all the “interested parties” – PI, institution, the funding agency’s Program Officer and Grants Management Specialist (or equivalents) – to ensure a timely and efficient process.

Considerations related to the process:

• Transfers may involve many parties, such as the PI, Research Administrator, Department Chair and/or Administrator, Dean’s Office, University Central Offices (ORSP, OTT), Sponsor’s Program Officer and Grants Management Specialist, and the other institution.
• The original grantee institution must be willing to transfer the grant to the new institution – grants are awarded to the institution, not the PI. As a result, before transferring a grant out of an institution the PI and/or Research Administrator will need to discuss their wishes with the Department Chair and/or Dean’s Office. 
• The sponsor has the right to refuse the request coming from the institution.
• Forms and information required to transfer grants may change from one grant to another. Always contact the Program Officer and Grants Management Specialist each time for up-to-date instructions.
• When in the process of transferring grants into UM, consider requesting a Hardship Account. Transfers often take some time to process and establishing an account will allow appropriate charges to be associated with the P/G until the award arrives – saving time later!
• When transferring grants out of the UM, equipment, personnel, and other research-related items, for example lab notebooks, data sets, or intellectual property, may need to be specifically reviewed and authorized for transfer out as well.  Please see the resources below for more information.

Resources

• Presentation (November 2014) on Transferring Grants between Institutions.
• RASC website - Best practice document on transfer of institution general considerations.
• Medical School's Post-Award Best Practices related to post award close out of transfer projects.
• UMMS Office of Research's Managing a Research Operation page.
• ORSP provided checklists for US Army Medical and NSF.

The video addresses why you might consider using advance (aka Hardship) accounts and the risk associated with them.

This video is a quick reminder about the importance of maintaining proper documentation.

Navigate: E-ssentials eLearning Modules - A collection of self-paced elearning modules covering a variety of topics related to research administration at U-M. Addressing common tasks, concepts, and business processes encountered throughout the Sponsored Project Lifecycle, Navigate: E-ssentials also provides resources and job aids to assist research administrators with the successful management of a sponsored project.

Office of Research Training Opportunities - Other units within the Medical School's Office of Research often provide training sessions on various topics. This link will provide information on other those opportunities.

Campus Training Opportunities - The Office of Research and Sponsored Projects (ORSP) on campus also offers training sessions on a variety of topics.

This video provides on overview of university supported tools and resources available to research administrators for managing Financial Status Reports (FSRs).

This video provides on overview of university supported tools and resources available to research administrators for Troubleshooting Closeouts (PG Inactivation).